2493957585
Taryl Spinks, an aftersales manager at Snows Toyota dealership in Paignton, has won £21,000 for unfair dismissal and after he was sacked for standing up to a difficult customer who harassed his team.
The customer, who cannot be named for legal reasons, brought a car in to have some work done. Some initial diagnostic work was carried out, which X wanted to get the work covered by a warranty.
Over several days, according to the Tribunal Ruling he was aggressive, abusive, and intimidating in his manner towards employees at the site staff, mainly over the telephone.
Spinks tried to act as a buffer between X and the dealership staff, and to try to get the warranty issue resolved.
The facility to record the conversations through incoming telephone conversations was unavailable at the Paignton site, but 29 calls from X were logged.
On 14 February 2025, X called again and was aggressive towards Spionks, until the latter identified himself, which surprised X, who then calmed down.
The same day at the Spinks sent an email to X including the following “…calling us bluntly telling us that we are not doing our jobs is not going to help yourself. My team do not want to accept your calls due to the allegations and mannerisms, which I witnessed today, towards them when calling in.
“You have been banned from our site previously and have been allowed to trade with ourselves under the conditions that this behaviour does not resume, if it continues, I will have no choice but to end this partnership in trying to get your vehicle fixed and insist you seek another dealership to start these proceedings with again. I will not have my team feeling threatened by anyone.”
There after there was a series of email claims and polite rebuttals culminating in an email from Spinks saying: “Please allow me to put this in simple terms. At no point have we asked you to contact anyone. You have done this because it is your character to stir everything up and make everything a mess…”
Snows could not find evidence that X was abusive or threatening. The Tribunal said this was not good enough.
The Tribunal said” It was unfortunate and somewhat surprising that the Respondent did not record all client calls into the Paignton site, but the failure to do so made it necessary for the Respondent’s investigator or decision makers to carry out further and better enquiries about X’s behaviour, by interviewing specific team members whose conversations with X had been witnessed by the Claimant. Those investigations, which would have been easy for the Respondent, were not carried out.”
The Tribunal ruled the claim of wrongful dismissal succeeded. The claim of unfair dismissal succeeds with contributory fault of 15%.
For the full reasons and the Judgement behind the ruling click here.
